Sunday morning. Time to write

I was up just before 7 a.m., and I have spent the last 75 minutes finding the articles I need to work on, collecting information, setting up the NPR player and hydrating.

Not even any coffee yet.

I may lay down for a quick bit, then get to work.

Buncha stuff to the for the paper.

A couple of resumes for folks.

Cover letter for my wife.

Maybe some general writing.

Good think I love to write.

Some photos to do.

Bills to do.

"Day off, eh?"

Sunday afternoon at Chez Villa Casa Haus

Listening to the Red Sox.

Writing newspapers.

Drinking coffee.

Posting to facebook.

Pee on my leg and tell me it's raining . . .

I am trying really hard not to be critical of the SCA's Board of Directors, but this sure reads like "It's a done deal," even though they say it's not.

*****
Sending proposed changes to Corpora out for commentary is part of the required process for changes to our governing documents.  Proposed changes are not a ‘done deal’ at that point in the process, commentary is necessary for the BoD to be able to make the most appropriate decision for our organization.  After the commentary period is over, the BoD has to decide whether to (i) approve the proposed change, (ii) submit alternate wording for commentary, or (iii) reject the proposed change.  It takes a unanimous decision by the BoD to approve a proposed change to the Bylaws of the SCA and a two-thirds majority to approve a proposed change to Corpora or to the SCA’s Corporate Policies.  Given that Directors represent multiple kingdoms, diverse SCA activities, differing levels of SCA experience, and decidedly individualized opinions, achieving a unanimous decision or even a two-thirds majority is not easily done. We want to thank everyone who has submitted commentary in the last few months on current topics – the response has been much more substantial than in the past, and we greatly appreciate it.
*****