liamstliam: (Default)
liamstliam ([personal profile] liamstliam) wrote2009-10-12 02:58 pm

East Kingdom, Crown List is out!

It's here and has consorts

This is not in specific Order of Precedence yet.

The dukes, counts, etc., are all group together, but they are not ordered.

I will undoebtedly have some thoughts later.

 

[identity profile] tonypatriquin.livejournal.com 2009-10-12 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok Your Elmetness, is Liam also correct that OHMs rank above AoAs? I hadn't thought that was the case.

[identity profile] liamstliam.livejournal.com 2009-10-12 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
My countess, a heraldry wonk, says I am right.

But it's always good to check on me. ;)

[identity profile] math5.livejournal.com 2009-10-13 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
The members of OHM go even before the court barons
http://op.eastkingdom.org/March/index.html

[identity profile] baronessv.livejournal.com 2009-10-13 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
Only if the CB didn't carry a Grant, which doesn't seem to happen here often.

[identity profile] math5.livejournal.com 2009-10-13 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
True.
That's why I added the link to the list to make sure there was no misinformation :)

[identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com 2009-10-13 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
It is complex. But you are a more-than-competent lawyer, so you can cope. :-)

In terms of rank, an AoA is an AoA, and according to SCA (Federal) law, they are all the same.

The Order of Precedence (how Kingdoms set up their order of march) is local to each Kingdom (State) law. In the East, should all things be equal, a person with an Order of High Merit and an AoA is marched before a person with an AoA. If two people match utterly, the time at which the award was given is used to break the tie.

I have, in fact, had to determine that an AoA was given in the East versus one given the same day in An Tir, and the An Tir one being given in morning court, came first. :-)

So, no: the OHM+AoA does not rank higher than an AoA. But it comes first in the order of march in the East. Take that OHM-AoA to another Kingdom, and no one will care. :-)

[identity profile] tonypatriquin.livejournal.com 2009-10-13 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
"But you are a more-than-competent lawyer, so you can cope. :-)"

Thanks for that. I'll confess I had to read this twice :-) The Federal/State analogy is very useful.

And this is a fascinating and educational answer. I hadn't appreciated the distinction between rank and precedence. Thanks, Tibor.

re: and the An Tir one being given in morning court

[identity profile] etherial.livejournal.com 2009-10-13 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
Did you take the Time Zone into account?

Re: and the An Tir one being given in morning court

[identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com 2009-10-13 12:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes.

[identity profile] msmemory.livejournal.com 2009-10-14 02:32 pm (UTC)(link)
So, no: the OHM+AoA does not rank higher than an AoA

You are mistaken, my friend.

[identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com 2009-10-14 03:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd be glad of an explanation.

My reasoning was this: consider a person with an AoA and another with an OHM+AoA who moves from the East, to some other Kingdom.

Which of them comes first in a march of precedence in that Kingdom? As a general rule, the AoA is used, and whichever was bestowed first is of the higher precedence.

Here, in the East, we value our own very much, which is appropriate. So we march the OHM+AoA first.

So, by my understanding, the OHM+AoA does not rank higher than an AoA.

(Next up - we dice over whether a Patent truly outranks an AoA, if one gets literal with the law. LOL. Yours in Silverwinging.)

[identity profile] lumineaux.livejournal.com 2009-10-13 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
The best place to look to answer Precedence questions is here:
http://op.eastkingdom.org/March/index.html

Tibor answered your exact question.