East Kingdom, Crown List is out!
Oct. 12th, 2009 02:58 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's here and has consorts
This is not in specific Order of Precedence yet.
The dukes, counts, etc., are all group together, but they are not ordered.
I will undoebtedly have some thoughts later.
This is not in specific Order of Precedence yet.
The dukes, counts, etc., are all group together, but they are not ordered.
I will undoebtedly have some thoughts later.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:15 pm (UTC)I'm bothered to see that the list has the same couple twice, as they are fighting for each other (they should just appear once), and that in general the list is organized by rank of men, never women.
I think I grow old. :-)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:18 pm (UTC)And I think the other bits will get cleaned up after the list is confirmed.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:38 pm (UTC)But consider, for example, Ogedai/Nataliia. Ranked by his precedence, not hers. Consider that Gabriel/Sonja are listed once by his precedence, once by hers.
What should the precedence level of a couple be? Traditionally, it has been by the higher of the pair. In this case, however, it is clear to me that the precedence ordering (even though this is far from the final ordering) is skewed a lot by either gender bias or, perhaps, the combatant and not the couple's overall precedence.
I'd like to think it was the combatant's precedence - perhaps that would explain the list (like your position in it) better.
In any case, I'm feeling old. :-)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:54 pm (UTC)I have seen it done with the order of precedence by couple (that is, whoever is higher).
(It is usually done by the fighters' precedence.)
Right now, if you go by fighters' rank, Lord Ulfr Stevenson will be 43rd or 44th. He got his AoA at War of the Roses.
If they go with the precedence of the couple, he's standing there at 10th, behind Count Griffyth and ahead of the highest-ranking knight (Kenric?), because he's fighting for Alethea.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:re: and the An Tir one being given in morning court
From:Re: and the An Tir one being given in morning court
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:39 pm (UTC)Who gave Ernst precedence? He's just a herald. :-)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:52 pm (UTC)Ha. Elevating the staff. Ridiculous. That's like making a cobbler a Peer Of The Realm.
Next thing you know, the Baron's will try some kind of revolt. Never happen.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 09:34 pm (UTC)My contribution: Assuming this is 'who gets to fight for the Crown', in An Tir the answer is 'whoever show up in armor on the specified day'.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 09:38 pm (UTC)In the East they require that fighters and consorts submit a "Letter of Intent" (To Fight) prior to Crown Tourney. I think the cut-off deadline is a month before the event, but it is ultimately up to the discretion of the Crown.
I admit I am still not entirely certain *why* they do things this way (I've heard varying explanations from "It makes it easier for the Heralds" to "It makes it easier for the MoLs" to "They want to know people are serious enough to write a letter) but that is the way it's done here and in some of the other "Eastern Rite" kingdoms.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 10:21 pm (UTC)1) The Crown has the right to deny anyone entry to the tourney if they think its a bad idea. This has been done for a variety of reasons, ranging from "you've only lived here a month" to "I hate you" but it makes for far less drama to reject them prior to the tourney than to reject them on the day of the tourney itself.
2) The East used to have (and maybe still has?) a rule that your membership has to extend a certain amount past the date of the event, to prevent a lapse. Less important than it used to be, but at one time a winner of Crown was denied his seat as prince because he was found not to have a valid membership when he won the tourney. Now they're able to check all that stuff in advance.
3) It makes it a lot easier on the MoL and Heraldic Staff to have a list in advance.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 10:38 pm (UTC)2) IIRC, they check the membership card of each fighter at the Lists table prior to line-up. It seems like it would be easy enough to have a "do not admit any fighter/consort whose membership expires prior to Date X" sign for the MoLs to go by.
3) I am genuinely curious, and am not trying to sound contrary, but how much extra work does that really require? What does having the list early enable you to do (as MoL, I know what it enables the Heralds to do).
Like I mentioned before, I think a lot of this has to do with the fact that Crown in the EK is a day event and a lot of people pretty much come to fight or be fought for and there's nothing else going on besides the tourney. Crown in An Tir is often over a 3-day weekend (Labor Day in September and something else in May), there's always a million other things besides the tourney, and the last one I went to (in 2008) had 1500 people in attendance.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 11:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 10:23 pm (UTC)1) It makes it easier for the seneschal (and fighters) to confirm that entrants have met the membership and residency requirements.
2) It gives the Crown an opportunity (prior to the combatant having made the trip) to bar the combatant from participating. Which happens *very* rarely, but is the Crown's right.
Varavi, seeing you and Ernst listed gave me a big smile. Fight well.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 10:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 11:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 03:36 pm (UTC)Is that an alternate persona?
;)